8 Why isn't there more work on tools for thought today?8 Why isn't there more work on tools for thought today?10 Why isn't there more work on tools for thought today?10 Why isn't there more work on tools for thought today?Why isn't there more work on tools for thought today?How can we develop transformative tools for thought?2020-10-18Journal10 Why isn't there more work on tools for thought today?8 Why isn't there more work on tools for thought today?\[the patent\] system is broken… What happened? A patent gold rush built by patent profiteers… Their value lies not in the innovation behind the patent but in the vagueness of the patent's claims and the ability to enforce it in a plaintiff-friendly forum… Where did the material for these bad patents come from? The advent of software… This led to idea-only patents being granted with broad and often invalid claims, and eager patent profiteers were only too glad to take advantage. Adobe shares in common with many other software companies that much of their patenting is defensive: they patent ideas so patent trolls cannot sue them for similar ideas. The situation is almost exactly the reverse of what you'd like. Innovative companies can easily be attacked by patent trolls who have made broad and often rather vague claims in a huge portfolio of patents, none of which they've worked out in much detail. But when the innovative companies develop (at much greater cost) and ship a genuinely good new idea, others can often copy the essential core of that idea, while varying it enough to plausibly evade any patent. The patent system is not protecting the right things. Continue reading…